Loading Events

Folklore and Anthropology in Conversation: When loud rumour speaks

October 15 2026 @ 10:00 am - 5:00 pm

‘Folklore and Anthropology in Conversation’

The Tenth Folklore Society – Royal Anthropological Institute Joint Seminar

Thursday 15 October, 2026, 10:00-17:00, at 50 Fitzroy Street, London W1T 5BT

This is a hybrid event. Booking available soon.


‘When Loud Rumour Speaks’:
      Informal communication in the modern online world

 

Anthropologists know what it is to deal with networks of informal communication. Field research in small-scale, face-to-face social situations, be they villages, neighbourhoods or organisations, has always entailed coming to grips with this in one way or another. Folklorists, whether collecting ‘traditional’ oral material of various sorts or documenting urban and contemporary legends and the online world of memes and viral narratives, have always recognised the fundamental importance of informal communication.

Anthropology and folklore meet here in shared and long-standing interests in rumour, which have only been sharpened by the rise and rapid expansion of the Internet.

This meeting will consider the social roles of rumour in the broadest senses, whether comparatively or in case studies, and will explore what the two disciplines have in common in this respect, what they can learn from each other, and how, if at all, rumour has changed in the online era: are we witnessing the emergence of a new mode of communication, somewhere between the face-to-face/oral and the literate?

Presentations will be given in person, but conference attendees may attend either on-site, or via Zoom. There is no registration fee. For on-site attendees, refreshments and a light lunch will be provided free of charge.


Programme

09.30 Introduction

Session One 10.00-11.00

Rumours during uncertain times Henrik Olinder, Swedish Civil Defence and Resilience Agency

Narratives of Uncertainty: Rumour, gossip and vernacular communication in response to the events of January 2022 in Almaty, Kazakhstan Dr Alexander Parkyn-Smith, University of Cumbria

11.00-11.30 Coffee

Session Two 11.30-12.30

“When Childbirth Stories Speak Loudest”: Rumour, Informal Knowledge, and the Circulation of Rights in Maternal Care Dr Katrine Nohr, University College London

The Shapeshifting Child-Eater: Constructing a Transgender Monster Gabriel Baxter-Baker, University of East Anglia.

12.30-14.00 Lunch

Session Three 14.00-15.00

Haunted Estates: Supernatural Rumour, Working-Class Memory and the Informal Archive in England Hannah Walton, independent scholar

Cryptid continuum: the evolution of British cryptids from campfires to the digital realm Dawn Brissenden, Leicester de Montfort University

15.00-15.30 Coffee

Session Three 15.30-16.30

In Defence of Abigail Williams: The ongoing rumour mill of the Salem Witch Trials Dr Jessica Lloyd May, independent scholar

‘You’re Not Going to Like the Answer’ – An Analysis of Vagueposting in Contemporary Social Media Communication Kirsty Asher, University of Hertfordshire

16.30-17.00 Closing Remarks and Discussion


Abstracts

Rumours during uncertain times

Henrik Olinder, Swedish Civil Defence and Resilience Agency

It is clear that in recent years people have become more interested in preparing themselves for different types of crises that may affect them and their country. Pandemics, the climate change and the war in Ukraine, to name a few, have obviously contributed to this. The ongoing war of words between different parties contributes to shifting in trust, changed media consumption and the emergence of an information vacuum. Countries are now starting to prepare for a possible major war. This means that citizens must be protected and the authorities must give instructions by actively conducting crisis communication. This occurs when public concern arises at the same time as rumours spread rapidly in traditional ways and in media platforms. Whether the rumours are credible or plausible it is something that citizens and authorities must assess. Under these circumstances, when citizens need information from authorities, trust is tested and the risk of public concern arises.

How do rumours affect our ability to manage crises? And how can governments and organizations respond to public concern in a constructive way? The new book Rumours on the Agenda – Managing Public Concern Through Crisis Communication provides some answers to these questions. The book offers both research-based knowledge and practical tools to meet one of the greatest communication challenges of our time. The book is the result of a multi-year project with the goal of improving organizations’ crisis management and changing the way we communicate during crises. It is the first of its kind to focus on rumours as a central factor in crisis communication – and how they affect both public behavior and government actions.

In this presentation, results from a study on crisis communication, rumours and public concern will be discussed.

 

Narratives of Uncertainty: Rumour, gossip and vernacular communication in

response to the events of January 2022 in Almaty, Kazakhstan

Dr Alexander Parkyn-Smith, University of Cumbria

Based on long-term ethnographic fieldwork in Almaty, Kazakhstan, this paper explores how young urban middle-class respondents create vernacular narrative accounts of their lives in response to dramatic social, political and economic change and the threat of future existential risks.

Conceptually, I draw on Goffman’s dramaturgical analysis (1959), developed by Scott into onstage/offstage categories (1985). My research found that a young post-Soviet generation created onstage narratives to provide structure, control and certainty in everyday life. However, ruptures to the everyday—such as a flood, earthquake, currency devaluation, or even a marriage—expose vulnerabilities only discussed in informal private contexts.    Drawing on the anthropology of gossip and rumour (Besnier, 2009; Gluckman, 1963; Paz, 2009), I analyse offstage communication. When faced with uncertainty, research participants turned first to trusted relations such as kin and close family. When these sources could not provide answers, rumour and gossip took on a significant role, allowing public discussion of uncertainty without destabilising onstage narratives.

This paper focuses on an anthropological case study of the January 2022 events of Almaty, Kazakhstan, when a violent government crackdown on public protest produced intense uncertainty. Drawing on new interviews and analysis of online information flows on Telegram channels, forums, WhatsApp discussions and a government–sponsored feature film, I bring this case study into a discursive space to explore how the conceptual and analytical frameworks offered by the study of folklore could further our understanding of narratives of uncertainty.

 

 

“When Childbirth Stories Speak Loudest”: Rumour, Informal Knowledge, and the Circulation of Rights in Maternal Care

Dr Katrine Nohr, UCL

Anthropological work on childbirth has long recognised the central role of storytelling in shaping women’s expectations, fears, and strategies of care. Drawing on comparative ethnographic research with mothers in Tanzania and the United Kingdom, this paper examines how informal communication—childbirth stories, whispered warnings, peer advice, and digitally mediated narratives—functions as a form of rumour that travels alongside, and often against, formal biomedical and human-rights discourses. Based on in-depth interviews and participant observation, the paper shows that most mothers did not primarily engage with human rights through formal legal knowledge or institutional mechanisms. Instead, understandings of “what is safe,” “what is dangerous,” and “what one can demand” were produced and circulated through informal networks: conversations between women after birth, maternity ward anecdotes, WhatsApp groups, antenatal classes, and online forums. These narrative exchanges operated as a hybrid communicative mode— neither purely oral nor fully institutional—through which experiential knowledge was collectively evaluated, moralised, and transmitted. In Tanzania, childbirth rumours about abusive staff, abandoned patients, or fatal outcomes shaped women’s risk calculations and discouraged overt rights-claiming during labour. In the UK, digitally amplified birth stories—often framed as trauma narratives—produced a parallel economy of expertise that both empowered women and intensified anxiety, contributing to post-birth complaint cultures. Across both sites, rumour did not function as misinformation but as a pragmatic, socially embedded form of knowledge-making under conditions of uncertainty and power asymmetry. By situating childbirth stories as folklore-like narratives with real social effects, this paper argues that informal communication is central to how rights are interpreted, negotiated, and resisted in practice. It contributes to debates on rumour by showing how contemporary maternal knowledge circulates in a space between face-to-face storytelling and online virality, reshaping authority, trust, and agency in modern healthcare settings.

 

The Shapeshifting Child-Eater: Constructing a Transgender Monster

Gabriel Baxter-Baker aka þ (Thorn), University of East Anglia.

‘Myths’ about minorities are circulated by word of mouth, at hyperspeed via the Internet, and – often – by the deliberate circulation of selected rumour by billionaire-backed media. Currently, trans+ people are caught in a web of insidious stories and positioned as a perfect fairytale villain: shapeshifting, myriad, and simultaneously unimaginably strong yet easily defeatable.

Websites such as MumsNet have been pivotal to the growth of the anti-trans movement; rumours of detransition rates, manipulation and predation have led to large-scale attacks on trans healthcare, personhood and legal status, such as the Cass Review and the Department for Education’s guidance regarding gender-questioning students. A Transgender Monster is constructed, held up as a corrupting, or polluting, force against the Innocent Child.

And yet, the internet, rumour – and humour – are our social defence. We make forums, Subreddits and Signal groups to pass on community knowledge of DIY transition, sources for grey-market hormones, safe places to live, and reviews of doctors who may be willing to work with us or who mean us harm. The finer the rumour mill grinds us, the stronger our own whisper networks become.

This creative-critical intervention is a timely consideration of the tensions between the mainstream trans panic and the underground rumours that keep trans+ people alive. It will argue that the generation of anti-trans rhetoric, and the survival strategies trans+ folk share between ourselves, not only draw heavily from folklore and fairytale archetypes, but rely almost entirely on rumour shared at various scales.

This presentation runs for twenty minutes, including an eight minute performance drawing on themes of shapeshifting, DIY transition and the monstrous, as enabled or created via rumour.

 

Haunted Estates: Supernatural Rumour, Working-Class Memory and the Informal Archive in England

Hannah Walton (see attached PDF)

Cryptid continuum: the evolution of British cryptids from campfires to the digital realm. 

Dawn Brissenden, Leicester de Montfort University

In the digital age the way that we communicate and form communities is ever changing. While some may question whether folklore can continue to exist with an increasing amount of communication occurring online, folklorists acknowledge that wherever communication occurs folklore can exist and be created. This presentation will provide an overview of my PhD project in which I am exploring the evolution of British cryptids from oral tradition into contemporary digital representations, specifically through the use of YouTube as an archive. This presentation will also consider rumour and hoax in the narratives around British cryptids. This project considers how, and in what ways, social media can be used as a tool for the preservation and remediation of folkloric creatures.

 

In Defence of Abigail Williams: The ongoing rumour mill of the Salem Witch Trials

Dr Jessica Lloyd May

Rumour was central to the unfolding of the Salem Witch Trials, shaping accusations, testimony, and public perceptions in ways that had devastating consequences. More than three centuries later, the same event continues to circulate through informal channels of communication, but now within the algorithmic environments of social media. Contemporary platforms reward sensationalism, simplified narratives, and emotionally engaging content, allowing historical rumours and long-discredited interpretations to reach new audiences with remarkable speed.

This paper examines how social media has become a site for the continual reinvention of Salem’s history. Popular content frequently revives the disproven ergot poisoning theory as an explanation for the trials, presents Abigail Williams as the calculating architect of the persecutions, or reframes those executed as historical witches whose identities are reclaimed by contemporary magical practitioners, rather than as victims of a miscarriage of justice. These narratives privilege compelling storytelling over historical evidence, illustrating how online informal communication perpetuates myths that have become culturally embedded despite scholarly challenges.

By exploring the intersection of folklore, digital culture, and public history, this paper argues that social media functions as a contemporary rumour mill, where historical events are continually reshaped through repetition, reinterpretation, and viral circulation. In doing so, it considers how the modern transmission of folklore and misinformation influences public understandings of the past, demonstrating that the mechanisms through which rumour gains authority have evolved in form rather than function. Through case studies drawn from TikTok, Instagram, and online witchcraft communities, this paper explores how folklore, rumour, and platform algorithms combine to create persuasive but historically inaccurate narratives, raising broader questions about authority, authenticity, and the digital afterlives of historical events.

 

‘You’re Not Going to Like the Answer’ – An Analysis of Vagueposting

in Contemporary Social Media Communication

Kirsty Asher, University of Hertfordshire

Vagueposting has emerged as a significant Internet communication trend in 2026. Previously known as Vaguebooking due to its connections with Facebook, the early form of the term was associated with cries for help or attention-seeking in withholding key information from Facebook statuses. Since 2025, vagueposting has now developed into a viral Internet trend through which misinformation and rumour is facilitated in the expansive lack of key information. This trend is coinciding with social media being increasingly charged by algorithmically-driven engagement, and Internet oral tradition being appropriated for clicks and likes. This presentation will present a case study on contemporary vagueposting on X (formerly Twitter) as an emerging form of viral narrative. Focusing particularly on posts which encourage speculation about a certain subject, I will demonstrate how vagueposting engages with human curiosity, contributes to a development in Internet meme culture, and has the capacity to create unfounded rumours. Additionally, this presentation will confront the notion that social media which prioritises viral engagement is contributing to an oral tradition which is compromised and inauthentic, and the increasingly negative effect this has on Internet users as individuals, and on broader online human interaction.


Image: https://pixabay.com/illustrations/yarn-phone-communication-network-2091195/

How to give to the RAI

Your support makes all the difference to the RAI

The RAI needs your support. We are an independent charity dedicated to anthropology. Please can you help us with our essential work by making a donation today. With your support we can continue to deliver our inspiring online events programme and run our flagship events (London Anthropology Day, the RAI Film Festival and our international conferences). We can continue our essential support of anthropological research, to care for our archive, manuscript and photo collections and develop our education programmes to create globally informed citizens. Thank you for your interest in this event, we appreciate you supporting the RAI.

Have you considered becoming an RAI Fellow?

Many people from all over the world are affiliated to the RAI. We welcome anyone with an interest in the subject, whether working in an academic institution or not. Our affiliates include academic specialists, students, those working in fields where anthropology has practical applications, and those whose interest is captured by the subject matter of anthropology.

Join the RAI

Mailing list

Interested in news and updates from the RAI? Subscribe to our mailing list below.

Name